I could not help but see a parallel between the behaviour of the Romans
during Caesar and us Indians during the recent developments that were supposed
to change the face of politics. Romans were fickle and so are we. We blindly
trusted what this new party (AAP) promised without logically questioning the promises.
Thanks to the 15 year ‘rule’ of the Congress, we were ready to accept anyone
but the congress. But, despite getting just 8 seats, the Congress did manage to
form the government. Did they not? See beyond the veil and you will know.
Here are a few observations cum solutions for the Chief Protestor of
Delhi.
1. A party of U turns, yet Mr. K is an
honorable man
When Mr. K left Anna Hazare, he did so under the pretext that the days
for protests were over and now it is time for action. He has gone back on these
words and again sat on dharna against the policemen who did not follow the
orders of his minister, inconveniencing a lot many Delhiites. He asked people
not to join him in these protests, but just a day into the dharna, he made
another turn and asked everyone to pour in and threaten to flood Rajpath with
lakhs of supporters. While this incident is recent, there is a history to it.
If you recall, Mr. K had promised to take actions against Sheila Dixit
for her alleged role in various scams. He went to the extent of saying that he
had the proof against Ms. Dixit (a 370 page report). The moment he came to
power, he started dilly dallying and asked BJP instead to furnish him with the
proofs. That is a serious breach of trust of the people and there are other
such instances.
The most glaring of course remains the fact that despite swearing on
his children that he won’t take Congress’s support, he formed the government
with them. Clearly ‘Kursi’ triumphed ‘values’. Many AAP supports would say “ we
went to the people of Delhi and through SMS responses they asked us to come to
power ” . Are you that naïve? You do not know who is voting, Delhi or rest of
India, Children below 18 or adults who exercised their rights to vote, Congress
supporters who would want that their party still call the shots or genuine
people who had an opinion! There is no way of tracking those, yet, you eclipsed
yourself behind “AAM Admi” for that decision.
Getting a buy in first from 10 Janpath will be useful before every
announcement.
2. Misplaced policies that does not benefit the
needy, but, he is an honorable man
The policies that they are trying to implement do not benefit the ones
they are placed for. For example in case of the Water subsidy,
only people who can afford to pay and do not require any subsidy on water would
benefit. The tankers with leaking waters will continue to go to those slums who
greatly require the water. There will still be fights on the streets over
buckets of water and there will always be the water mafia who would continue to
exploit. What they should have done was to work on the supply side – something
like a project to clean the Yamuna and then in a certain time period install
water meters in all the households of Delhi. Populism won’t benefit the poor,
it benefits just AAP.
Then comes the Power subsidy–
announcement of reduction of power tariff by 50% (though Mr. K subsequently
suggested that it is only under consideration) was also in conjunction with the
CM’s earlier appeal to not pay the power bills. What is has led to is that
those who adhered to his suggestions are now being summoned by courts for power
thefts. Instead of em-‘powering’ the people, he is taking the steam out of
Delhi’s life.
FDI in retail – No research behind this decision. We do not
know why they are opposing FDI in retail. What you should do is to study the
cases across the world and then come to a conclusion. Make Delhi a level
playing field for our local vendors and then introduce the FDI in retail to
foster competition. This will benefit the consumers and also the farmers who
will not have to go through middle men.
Law and leader – Mr. Somnath Bharti can go around calling women prostitutes
and people who support the AAP do not even say
a word. Is that the sign of a political party that will work concertedly
for the rights and safety of women? Also, what about our relation with foreign nations (read Uganda for the time being)? Are we not compromising our positions thanks to a few rogue leaders!
3. Arrogance in everything he does, but, he
is an honorable man
Mr K and his team have started questioning the integrity of Kiran Bedi,
who most of the Delhi admires for her courage and wisdom. Just like a
Manishankar Aiyyer’s IQ level, Mr. K’s team’s seems to have hit a new low. Mr Kumar Vishwas of his party seems to drip in
the arrogance of power every time he speaks. If you follow his comments, you
would understand his views on women. I will refrain myself from detailing. Mr.
Somnnath Bharti, the “law” minister who Mr K feels is a worthy soldier in this “fight
against corruption” talks about spitting on Arun Jaitley and Harish Salve.
Reason - Because their opinions differ
from those of Mr. Bharti. News anchor turned politician Ashutosh (for whom it can
safely be said that he was furthering the cause of AAP as an anchor for IBN 7 ,
an act totally against the ethics of journalism and also a ramification of the
paid news nexus) appeals that “Kiran Bedi should be taught a lesson”. That was
because Kiran Bedi had read to him from Roget’s dictionary the meaning of “anarchy”.
Mr K himself has gone on abusing the police to such an extent that the people
of Delhi are actually beginning to feel sympathetic towards the police. What
will that do to police morale? You , as the chief minister do not talk about
the Police reforms and instead keep on badgering the police on any opportune
moment. Remember, at the end of the day, while you were busy getting clicked
sleeping in the cold, there were a lot many policemen and police women who woke
up the entire night to provide you security. Quickly adding that more would
have been spent on your security in these days thanks to your unruly ways that
would have otherwise.
On the integrity of Mr. K himself, I will share an excerpt from an
article that I read in the Hindu. (Courtesy: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/open-page/understanding-arvind-kejriwal/article5590889.ece)
..
“While
serving as a Joint Commissioner in the Revenue Department (Income Tax) under
the Finance Ministry, he went on a sabbatical (paid leave) from November 1, 2000
to October 31, 2002, and went abroad. One condition for such leave is that the
employee must serve continuously for at least three years after return, failing
which he or she must pay back the salary he drew over two years with penalty.
There is a
bond to be executed, with witnesses and guarantors. Mr. Kejriwal re-joined duty
on November 1, 2002 but at once went on 18 months’ leave without pay: he did
not serve continuously. He resigned in February 2006. As he had jumped bond,
his resignation was not accepted.
The Income
Tax Department sent him a notice in 2007 and again in 2008 asking him to pay
up. Mr. Kejriwal, who was by then appearing on TV almost every day, expected
the government to budge. He said the government could deduct the dues from his
retirement benefits; as he had done no wrong, his dues must be waived. After
sending a notice on August 5, the department sent another in September asking
him to pay up before October 27, 2011 — failing which he would not be relieved
and he would not get his retirement benefits.
Attachment
of his property and criminal action could follow. Mr. Kejriwal termed it an
attempt to create obstacles to his agitation against corruption. When he did
not respond by October 27, the department asked his guarantors to pay. Mr.
Kejriwal pleaded his friends should not be disturbed. When it became clear the
government would initiate proceedings, he announced on October 30, 2011 that he
would borrow from his friends and pay the dues of Rs.9.28 lakh. He wrote to
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on November 3, 2011 enclosing the cheque.”
“
Concluding remarks
When we were promised corruption free Delhi, we envisioned a government
machinery that was above suspicion. That has clearly not been the case. In fact,
the CM himself has gone against the oath that he took to preserve the
constitution of India and abide by the rule of law. People say that is has barely been a few days
for them in the power. I say, if this is how the first 20 – 25 days look,
imagine the chaos that will be created in the 5 years, if they were to complete
the term. Add to that, the attitude of AAP
supporters - “I am the most honest man walking around. If you differ from me,
you are corrupted by the system”.
The AAP should either get their act together (and I wish them well) or
the Grand old party of India should (for a change) relieve us from this ordeal
by withdrawing the support from them.
People should know one thing – any vote for AAP is a vote for the
Congress in broader picture and one that will lead to a fractured mandate and
with it to its evils. They are just another political party with “satta ki
lalsa” (lust for the chair) which they proved by declaring their national
aspiration without proving themselves in Delhi. Please do not be fooled by a
man screeching “I am your messiah” (or one who ostensibly screams “Do not
reject paying a bribe but video bana lo”)
7 comments:
I think we should not be too harsh on them. They have come with good intentions and it is understanble to make few mistakes along the way. But I also agree with your point that they should focus on governance first in Delhi and think about national aspirations in 2019.
Just that state politics is not a laboratory to experiment. The past few days have not been the most soothing to eyes.
Rahul, you have very well articulated the absurd drama that Mr. Kejriwal and AAP have been playing out. Facts are so clear, yet so many of our educated brethren continue to close their eyes and live under some romantic illusions of AAP. Their intent is questionable and their actions are regressive and dangerous. Hope our country sees it before it is too late!
Pretty good. Especially the reference to his actions while in the govt. is helpful.
Absolutely correct.. I am amazed to see people still want to give them one more chance
Dude nice blog !!!
I agree in almost everything which u said .. My heart still wants to give benefit of doubt to Mr Kejriwal's intentions however his commitment to what he stands for is completely missing whenever he sees harm for him or AAP i.e: Statement that " Mr Harshvardhan should bring the evidence against Sheila Dixit, if she is corrupt " for God's sake u formed your party with this premise... Having Dharna putting everybody in inconvenience .. AAP members fighting with police ... and then all of a sudden lifting it getting mere punishment of three days leave to two policemen ... if u were right and committed then u should have stayed ....
However my bigger concern is his ideology 1) Socialism in policy making which is against our economic development &
2) Self-Righteousness : Where he openly claims that everybody who is against AAP is wrong & corrupt ... and AAP members never do anything wrong ... If they are blaming everybody else then they should be bold enough to accepts the wrongs they have done commit that it wont be repeated ...
Thanks all for reading the blog and finding time to post a comment.
@ Vivek - I totally agree with the points you have made
Post a Comment